## Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic (Philosophia Antiqua) by Anthony N. Speca Download PDF EPUB FB2

Author: A. Speca Publisher: BRILL ISBN: Size: MB Format: PDF, Docs View: Get Books. Hypothetical Syllogistic And Stoic Logic Hypothetical Syllogistic And Stoic Logic by A. Speca, Hypothetical Syllogistic And Stoic Logic Books available in PDF, EPUB, Mobi Format.

Download Hypothetical Syllogistic And Stoic Logic books, This book uncovers and. The first chapters of the book deal with the original Aristotelian hypothetical syllogistic, and explain how Aristotle's later followers began to conflate it with Stoic logic.

The final chapters examine in detail the two most crucial surviving treatments of the subject, Boethius's On hypothetical syllogisms and On Cicero's Topics, which Cited by: Get this from a library. Hypothetical syllogistic and Stoic logic. [Anthony Speca] -- "This volume traces the development of Aristotle's hypothetical syllogistic through antiquity, and shows for the first time how it later became misidentified with the logic of the rival Stoic school.

Logic - Wikipedia. Similar books and articles. Logic, History Of: Ancient Logic. Susanne Bobzien - - In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Thomson Gale. Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic. Anthony Speca - - Brill. A Greek Parallel to Boethius' de Hypotheticis Syllogismis.

Susanne Bobzien - - Mnemosyne 55 (3) Hypothetical-Syllogistic-And-Stoic-Fg Adobe Acrobat Reader DCDownload Adobe Acrobat Reader DC Ebook PDF:Download free Acrobat Reader DC software the only PDF viewer that lets you read search print and interact with virtually any type of PDF file.

This work deals with Aristotle's "Topics," a textbook on how to argue successfully in a debate organised in a certain way. The origins of the three branches of logic can be found here: logic of propositions, of predicates and of relations.

Having dealt with the Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic book of the dialectical debates and the theory of the predicables, the central notion of the topos is analysed.

Logic (from Greek: λογική, logikḗ, 'possessed of reason, intellectual, dialectical, argumentative') is the systematic study of valid rules of inference, i.e. the relations that lead to the acceptance of one proposition (the conclusion) on the basis of a set of other propositions ().More broadly, logic is the analysis and appraisal of arguments.

differenr from, cenain sorts of hypothetical syllogism. Distant fiom the original Penpatos to which he belonged in spirit, but in an inteliecd amiosphere in which the common logical wisdom was Stoic, Aiexander fded to recognize cruciai differences beween hypothetical syiiogistic and Stoic logic.

The articles and books on Stoic logic which since then have been published, have examined in detail the Stoic contribution to the development of a logical calculus: J.

Łukasiewicz, 'Zur Geschichte der Aussagenlogik', Hypothetical Syllogistic and Stoic Logic book, 5 (). Mates, Stoic Logic (Berkeley, ). Becker, Zwei Untersuchungen zur antiken Logik (Wiesbaden, ). Stoic syllogistic is a system of formal logic that relies on two types of argumental rules: (i) 5 rules (the accounts of the indemonstrables) which determine whether any given argument is an indemonstrable argument, i.e.

an elementary syllogism the validity of which is not in need of further demonstration; (ii) one unary and three binary. Aristotle with a theory that corresponds to Stoic propositional logic (i.e. with a hypothetical syllogistic). 6 For Alexander’s view on the so-called ‘wholly hypothetical syllogisms’ see Bobzien [].

7 For the Stoic indemonstrables see e.g. Frede [], Bobzien []. For the early Peripatetic theory see. A syllogism (Greek: συλλογισμός, syllogismos, 'conclusion, inference') is a kind of logical argument that applies deductive reasoning to arrive at a conclusion based on two or more propositions that are asserted or assumed to be true.

In a form, defined by Aristotle, from the combination of a general statement (the major premise) and a specific statement (the minor premise), a. For the Stoics, a syllogism is a formally valid argument; the primary function of their syllogistic is to establish such formal validity.

Stoic syllogistic is a system of formal logic that relies. This book uncovers and examines the confusion in antiquity between Aristotle's hypothetical syllogistic and Stoic logic, and offers a fresh perspective on the development of Aristotelian logic Read more. The first chapters of the book deal with the original Aristotelian hypothetical syllogistic, and explain how Aristotle's later followers began to conflate it with Stoic logic.

The final chapters examine in detail the two most crucial surviving treatments of the subject, Boethius's On hypothetical. There are several elements of early Peripatetic hypothetical syllogistic preserved in it, and there is a large number of close parallels to Boethius' De Hypotheticis Syllogismis which we find in.

This book is an account of the conflation of hypothetical syllo- gistic and Stoic logic. The first chapter is a study of Aristotle's remarks on hypothetical syllogistic, which suggest that it was not a sentential logic such as the Stoics would develop.

SUSANNE BOBZIEN, PRE-STOIC HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISTIC IN GALEN's INSTITUTIO LOGICA, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, Vol Issue Supplement_77, Cat. –22), and in particular Theophrastus wrote many more books on logic (Diog.

Laert. and 50). Of their contemporaries, we know that Phaenias of Eresus and Strato of. texts All Books All Texts latest This Just In Smithsonian Libraries FEDLINK (US) Genealogy Lincoln Collection. Books to Borrow. Top Anthony Speca Hypothetical Syllogistic And Stoic Logic Philosophia Antiqua 87 Item Preview remove-circle Share or Embed This Item.

This page features a web based syllogistic machine for exploring fallacies, figures, terms, and modes of syllogisms. Syllogistic logic was first developed by Aristotle and later refined by the Scholastics during the Middle Ages.

Use of this syllogistic machine is self-explanatory. An exciting version of Stoic logic. Propositional logic. In propositional logic, hypothetical syllogism is the name of a valid rule of inference (often abbreviated HS and sometimes also called the chain argument, chain rule, or the principle of transitivity of implication).Hypothetical syllogism is one of the rules in classical logic that is not always accepted in certain systems of non-classical logic.

ABSTRACT: This paper traces the evidence in Galen's Introduction to Logic (Institutio Logica) for a hypothetical syllogistic which predates Stoic propositional logic. It emerges that Galen is one of our main witnesses for such a theory, whose.

This study explores the theoretical relationship between Aristotle’s theory of syllogism and his conception of demonstrative knowledge.

More specifically, I consider why Aristotle’s theory of demonstration presupposes his theory of syllogism. In reconsidering the relationship between Aristotle’s two Analytics, I modify this widely discussed question.

"In addition to developing the hypothetical syllogism, Stoic logic also elaborated categories, which likewise stand in contrast to Aristotelian thought.

The Stoics teach that there are four categories: substance, quality, disposition, and relative disposition.() Rather than being horizontal, signifying aspects of an enduring substance which. • M. Frede, “Stoic vs. Aristotelian Logic” in Frede, Essays in Ancient Philosophy (Oxford: ), • K.

Ierodiakonou, “The Stoic Division of Philosophy,” Phronesis 38 (), Stanford Encyclopedia: Stoicism and the Dialectical School. PRE‐STOIC HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISTIC IN GALEN'S INSTITUTIO LOGICA PRE‐STOIC HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISTIC IN GALEN'S INSTITUTIO LOGICA BOBZIEN, SUSANNE Footnotes 1 E.g.

Prantl, Die Geschichte der Logik im Abendlande vol. I (Leipzig ) – 2 Cf. Galen, On my own books, 43 (Kühn xix). 3 Cf. Kieffer, Galen's Institutio. PRE-STOIC HYPOTHETICAL SYLLOGISTIC IN GALEN'S INSTITUTIO LOGICA SUSANNE BOBZIEN The text of the Institutio Logica (IL) or Introduction to Logic is not found in Kühn because its sole surviving manuscript was first published, not long after its discovery, inand thus too late for inclusion in Kühn.

Traditional Logic Book II is a continuation of Memoria Press' Traditional Logic Book I. It covers the four figures of the traditional syllogism, the three forms of rhetorical arguments (called enthymemes), the three kinds of hypothetical syllogisms, the four kinds of complex syllogisms, as well as relational arguments.

The book also includes a wealth of examples of arguments from the Bible. Syllogism. Displaying all worksheets related to - Syllogism.

Worksheets are Syllogisms deductive reasoning, Work 4 laws of logic use the law of detachment to, Work, Disjunctive and hypothetical syllogisms, Work on the legal syllogism pr supplem Phil intro to logic, Extra practice with and 2, Chapter 3 syllogistic reasoning.

Book II takes the fantastic foundation laid in Book I to the next level. It covers the four figures of the traditional syllogism, the three forms of rhetorical arguments (called enthymemes), the three kinds of hypothetical syllogisms, the four kinds of complex syllogisms, as well as relational arguments.(i) People use Benson Mates' "Stoic logic" as basis and although this was a groundbreaking work in the early s, it is by far outdated now.

(ii) People use ancient texts uncritically, confounding elements from Peripatetic (i.e. the Aristotelian School) hypothetical syllogistic with Stoic logic and confounding Philonian elements of.

If you know p implies q and q implies r, hypothetical syllogism says you also know p implies r. Loading Autoplay When autoplay is enabled, a suggested video will automatically play next.